Transaction

fbf993efec7b424d20e9a992d6a9557eae91b20d38706b3700a4bc739fa2a56e
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 04:26:06
Fee Paid
0.00000012 BSV
(
0.00000581 BSV
-
0.00000569 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.16 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
94,069
Size Stats
1,180 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00000569 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMŸ<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7516#msg7516">Quote from: theymos on August 04, 2010, 03:43:56 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7498#msg7498">Quote from: Insti on August 04, 2010, 02:58:31 PM</a></div><div class="quote">What exactly is this 'dust spam' that this 0.01BTC transaction fee "solving"?<br/></div>Someone with only one Bitcoin could send 100,000,000 transactions, which might overload the network. This isn't a good solution, though -- the vulnerability will still exist when the limit is lowered because someone will certainly be saving a bunch of Bitcoins.<br/></div><br/>Someone with one Bitcoin can already send 100,000,000 transactions, by repeatedly sending the coin to themselves. How is it any different if the value of the transaction is 1 or 0.00000001 ?</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/fbf993efec7b424d20e9a992d6a9557eae91b20d38706b3700a4bc739fa2a56e