Transaction

faa4ef50ddcd6e1a059aefc4708aab8b995a57ca0fdd2a0e9cd7efc3c414da9e
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-21 21:32:47
Fee Paid
0.00000012 BSV
(
0.00471081 BSV
-
0.00471069 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.31 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
97,431
Size Stats
1,163 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00471069 BSV
  • j"19HxigV4QyBv3tHpQVcUEQyq1pzZVdoAutM<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=645.msg6757#msg6757">Quote from: Olipro on July 31, 2010, 12:56:50 AM</a></div><div class="quote">kind of, the point of this system is that you can leverage the network for escrow transactions so long as everything goes to plan, thereby ensuring a low cost. in instances of dispute, you will pay a third party.<br/></div>I'd go too with websites offering escrow services. The network is quiet complex as it is, without having to add all the confirmation, delay and dispute stuff.<br/>Currently when a transaction is broadcast it'll sooner or later be added to the block chain, what you are asking for is a mechanism to tentatively add a transaction and then dispute it later.<br/>Also who do you think will be the third party moderating the dispute? There is no real advantage in adding it to the protocol itself.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/faa4ef50ddcd6e1a059aefc4708aab8b995a57ca0fdd2a0e9cd7efc3c414da9e