Transaction

j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMr<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26753#msg26753">Quote from: S3052 on December 04, 2010, 10:08:04 AM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26749#msg26749">Quote from: jgarzik on December 04, 2010, 09:59:27 AM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26746#msg26746">Quote from: S3052 on December 04, 2010, 09:22:58 AM</a></div><div class="quote">in the wikileaks case its a great danger.<br/></div><br/>+1, I agree completely<br/><br/><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/12/paypal-wikileaks/">We know</a> that private and government forces are actively tracing, and trying to shut down, sources of wikileaks funding through all available means of pressure.<br/><br/>Does it make sense to actively give <i>multiple world governments</i> incentive to shut down bitcoin?<br/><br/>If you care about bitcoin's success, the answer is no.<br/></div><br/>That is exactly the issue.<br/><br/>I am so worried about the intent behind this wikileaks thread that, if i could, would only want to have "legallysafe" bitcoins in my wallet that are not connected to wikileaks or any other illegal matter.<br/>those who want to play this aggressive game against governments can do it, but i dont want to be connected to that.<br/></div><br/>Agreed, i have already spoken about this in some other wikileaks-related topic (or perhaps this one ?).<br/><br/><b>Engaging in wikileaks before Bitcoin has a chance to unfold its wings may kill it</b>.</div> text/html