j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM!<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652.msg7033#msg7033">Quote from: kiba on August 02, 2010, 04:32:55 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652.msg7031#msg7031">Quote from: throughput on August 02, 2010, 04:27:40 PM</a></div><div class="quote">Well, wikipedia is not a public driven project. It is driven by a limited community of it's editors,<br/>that is for a long time. Wikipedia represent collective and often inconsistent point of view<br/>of a small (compared to society) group of people.<br/>"Playing by the rules" is a favorite game of them. Don't play that game, do not entertain them.<br/><br/>I believe, it is some form of sexual perversion, wikipedism or like that... <img alt="Lips sealed" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/lipsrsealed.gif"/><br/><br/>Just find another wikipedia editor and he will play instead of you.<br/></div><br/>There is Wikipedia and its hierarchy, just like government and their hierarchy. The idea that the government could represent the people is laughable. <br/><br/>Similarly, the Wikipedia hierarchy devolved into politicking, no sexual perversion needed.<br/></div><br/>When they moved to that model the outcome was inevitable.... personal empire building. If it continues to a point where it destroys the product, something else will rise to challenge it, as long as they don't use the gov't to enforce their 'right' to be the arbitrators of 'editorial standards.'<br/><br/>Ta,</div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/f2602f4d767c3492f053dffd0ed5cb2f6adbd4e336d2b23626b328a41f28d3db