Transaction

f0cc91d41c67fa2fe63cfceeb035df2a1073545e99fc5d0cc8bc7e533b8ed38f
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 01:10:52
Fee Paid
0.00000012 BSV
(
0.00238756 BSV
-
0.00238744 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.27 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
93,637
Size Stats
1,168 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00238744 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM“<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7498#msg7498">Quote from: Insti on August 04, 2010, 02:58:31 PM</a></div><div class="quote">It seems to do more harm than good because it prevents micropayment implementations such as the one bytemaster is suggesting.</div>Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments. &nbsp;Not for things like pay per search or per page view without an aggregating mechanism, not things needing to pay less than 0.01. &nbsp;The dust spam limit is a first try at intentionally trying to prevent overly small micropayments like that.<br/><br/>Bitcoin is practical for smaller transactions than are practical with existing payment methods. &nbsp;Small enough to include what you might call the top of the micropayment range. &nbsp;But it doesn't claim to be practical for arbitrarily small micropayments. <br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/f0cc91d41c67fa2fe63cfceeb035df2a1073545e99fc5d0cc8bc7e533b8ed38f