Transaction

ee11a30a78eb91e9e1b7342c17723bddb0ca8b60aee57d1b65a3c19ff0dfb66a
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-24 15:37:17
Fee Paid
0.00000016 BSV
(
0.01108110 BSV
-
0.01108094 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.35 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
100,879
Size Stats
1,545 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.01108094 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM <div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=846.msg9942#msg9942">Quote from: Ground Loop on August 17, 2010, 07:25:38 PM</a></div><div class="quote">The recent upticks in difficulty have been remarkable.&nbsp; At 511.77, I've even stopped off those machines where I don't pay for marginal power consumption.&nbsp; My calculation is that the wear/tear from elevated temperatures and full-speed fans has more risk and cost than the BTC value.&nbsp; &nbsp;(You can question my math.)</div><br/>This is just what one should naturally expect. Some people have more tolerance for the cost of mining than others.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader">Quote</div><div class="quote">But my question is this: Are we seeing the rise of mega-power machines, or just an exponential increase in the number of nodes?&nbsp; That is, are the top-producing machines making leaps in power (over average), or are my machines still about average, just dwarfed by the number of participating machines?&nbsp; Is there any way to tell? (node counts?)</div><br/>I'd guess both. There is Art with his GPUs who claims to have about %10 of the generating power.<br/><br/>Then I see about 850 connections to the IRC channel. Not sure what its been like historically.<br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/ee11a30a78eb91e9e1b7342c17723bddb0ca8b60aee57d1b65a3c19ff0dfb66a