Transaction

ed9965c63b3da246bc27caa849cc75483f4bccadd0fcb368564dfd6f881bf2e7
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-27 16:16:35
Fee Paid
0.00000012 BSV
(
0.00739608 BSV
-
0.00739596 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.38 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
95,708
Size Stats
1,156 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00739596 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM‡<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2162.msg28304#msg28304">Quote from: RHorning on December 08, 2010, 11:30:46 PM</a></div><div class="quote">At the very least I wish that Satoshi would at least express his view on what he thinks about putting extra data into transactions beyond pure financial data into transactions, and I think this is only going to start an arms race for those who want to play with scripts and those who are trying to keep scripts "pure".&nbsp; All that has happened here is to simply lay the gauntlet down to get past the "IsStandard()" check and find transactions which can pass that test but still contain other data.<br/></div><br/>Yeah; it's pretty pointless. Why on Earth would any miner adopt this change, when it means that they will be getting fewer transaction fees due to the lost non-standard transactions?</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/ed9965c63b3da246bc27caa849cc75483f4bccadd0fcb368564dfd6f881bf2e7