Transaction

eca4c6ab8d2cf98ea7be3669583f41462ac14e2b1f4e1e4d991bb31aa45e2d3f
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-23 00:13:18
Fee Paid
0.00000013 BSV
(
0.03808962 BSV
-
0.03808949 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.67 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
96,701
Size Stats
1,218 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.03808949 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMÅ<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=360.msg3317#msg3317">Quote from: Some Mouse on July 15, 2010, 11:06:29 PM</a></div><div class="quote">I'm not particularly sold on the technical soundness of this program, honestly. Why use SHA256 rather than Whirlpool or SHA512? <br/></div>For the same reason they didn't use SHA1024 or SHA2048 or SHA4048 or SHA1000000000000000000000000000000000<br/><br/>There are lots of theoretical attacks that can be done against it, but if a program or new math proof can half the amount of time it takes to crack it, are we really worried about the encryption taking 100 billion years to crack but now with this new attack (insert math,attack,flaw) it's only going to take only 1 billion years to crack? How about a million years? Even one-hundred thousand years?<br/><br/>When they can crack SHA256 in under 10 minutes, I'll be worried, but until then, time is on your side.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/eca4c6ab8d2cf98ea7be3669583f41462ac14e2b1f4e1e4d991bb31aa45e2d3f