Transaction

j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMÞ<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=816.msg11593#msg11593">Quote from: lfm on August 29, 2010, 04:41:10 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=816.msg11583#msg11583">Quote from: Gespenster on August 29, 2010, 11:35:19 AM</a></div><div class="quote">The ByteReverse macro should probably be skipped before doing SHA-256 transforms.<br/></div><br/>before and after? theres several ByteReverse calls that probably need removal for the nonce ant the timestamp also.<br/><br/>in fact you may be able to do away completely with the temp block header thats mostly just there so it can be ByteReversed.<br/><br/><br/></div><br/>I think all of them can go away since SHA-256 expects it's bytestream to be big-endian. The fastest way to find out I think is to run the code through a debugger on both a BE and LE machine at the same time and compare results at every step. </div> text/html