Transaction

e8bbf16dcd10178e1d4bf8aac0acf166c4fb3bbf58206af650a674579770c439
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 15:35:09
Fee Paid
0.00000015 BSV
(
0.00501224 BSV
-
0.00501209 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.24 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
93,871
Size Stats
1,464 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00501209 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM¼<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg27645#msg27645">Quote from: em3rgentOrdr on December 07, 2010, 04:56:51 AM</a></div><div class="quote">Well before starting coding, let's make sure we have the protocol clearly written out. &nbsp;For instance, are we going to take my suggestion of using unitary, non-fractional, bitdnscoins where 1 block == 1 bitdnscoin, instead of having the number of bitdnscoins per block start at 50 and half every few years? &nbsp;Also, there is no need for fractional bitdnscoins since it doesn't make too much sense to own one-tenth of a domain name. &nbsp;Keep in mind that people can use fiat money or even bitcoins when trading unitary bitdnscoins, incase they need to make a trade of two domain names with unequal subjective valuations.<br/></div><br/>I'm not sure how it would work to only create one coin per block. Would this only buy the creation of one domain name?<br/><br/>The reason I like the idea of fractional coins is it would give more flexibility in transaction fees. If it costs one coin to register a domain, it might make sense that a good size for the transaction fee would be fractional.<br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/e8bbf16dcd10178e1d4bf8aac0acf166c4fb3bbf58206af650a674579770c439