Transaction

df94924ce9936cf0b14e2510abfd102664e7baa4ec1fa62417536fe2a2ffa772
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-29 05:31:22
Fee Paid
0.00000019 BSV
(
0.00424673 BSV
-
0.00424654 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.53 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
94,748
Size Stats
1,804 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00424654 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM<div class="post">I think then now would be a good point to work out a separate "server" and "client" for the next release. Those want to run servers that sit on fast fiber connections and run 24/7 (like myself) can do this for the good of the service. Those that just want to send money from point A to point B can use the client which either function as a full blown node server (like it does now) or give the option to connect to "trusted" servers in the network and just have the server do the hard work and report back to the client when coins are transfered around properly.<br/><br/>Since the network can be participated by both dedicated server farms and Joe Blow with his laptop, you still maintain the open network and crypto security that you need, but also offer another solution for those less technical and wanting an easy click and send interface that they have now, website payments, etc.<br/><br/>I mean, I'm seeing stories about Bit Coin all over the web now, so the popularity is coming quickly and people are going to poke around the source code and program, then come here to make suggestions/complaints/worship/etc.<br/><br/>Might as well get a head start.&nbsp; <img alt="Grin" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/grin.gif"/><br/><br/>It's win/win because people can run thin clients, people can run servers, and those that don't trust either can run their own client/server/p2p application themself, but it all benefits BitCoin one way or another.&nbsp; <img alt="Wink" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/wink.gif"/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/df94924ce9936cf0b14e2510abfd102664e7baa4ec1fa62417536fe2a2ffa772