Transaction

d4df3da3e2328c4be4144c07773b61bc3d24aeffcf2e77ab7679d1470c6cbb5c
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-27 15:20:06
Fee Paid
0.00000010 BSV
(
0.00747432 BSV
-
0.00747422 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.01 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
93,432
Size Stats
999 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00747422 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMë<div class="post">That's a good point about fee competition, but I'm wondering about near-term implications of this spam flood, too, like<br/><br/><ul style="margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0;"><li>What happens to the transactions that don't make it into the current block? &nbsp;(somewhat rhetorical question... the answer is "they keep piling up in memory" AFAICS, but that raises a bigger question -- how to deal with ever-larger TX cache?)</li><li>Will this create a de facto situation where TX fee is required for "normal" bitcoin users?</li><li>Would it make sense to introduce a consensus blacklist, of abusive bitcoin addresses? ie. miners could -- at their discretion -- simply drop TX's with the blacklisted addresses.</li></ul><br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/d4df3da3e2328c4be4144c07773b61bc3d24aeffcf2e77ab7679d1470c6cbb5c