Transaction

d4deebf4b9e21d7b3cb65e68168edbaa4c3a008f07b46b02cd803ff5e169b4c8
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 23:19:50
Fee Paid
0.00000012 BSV
(
0.03883687 BSV
-
0.03883675 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.88 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
97,004
Size Stats
1,102 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.03883675 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMR<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=360.msg3060#msg3060">Quote from: gavinandresen on July 15, 2010, 02:28:36 AM</a></div><div class="quote">There's a <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/348109/is-double-hashing-a-password-less-secure-than-just-hashing-it-once">stackoverflow</a> question about double hashing, by the way.&nbsp; Consensus is that it's not less secure.&nbsp; It's too late for my brain to process the nuances of hashing...<br/></div><br/>Note that that discussion is referring to hashing passwords - and the most upvoted comment is explicitly discussing such with that in mind. Trying to do a dictionary attack has no coherent meaning, and someone directly attacking the algorithms behind bitcoin would obviously not start there. It will attack the algorithm.<br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/d4deebf4b9e21d7b3cb65e68168edbaa4c3a008f07b46b02cd803ff5e169b4c8