Transaction

d3c1dd906ee2aa67aabb059f412de50ae822efdcbfbf55a613f4c4e7b89b181e
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-25 00:34:06
Fee Paid
0.00000012 BSV
(
0.00501167 BSV
-
0.00501155 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.85 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
96,023
Size Stats
1,105 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00501155 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMU<div class="post">Can't we force a user to use a new address for receiving payments?<br/>Every time a payment is received display another Bitcoin address in the address bar. (only transactions via Bitcoin addresses, NOT IPs of course, since that'd be useless, right?)<br/>The actual key would still be kept to ensure that the user would still receive payments of people sending to the same address. (We wanna minimize "lost" Bitcoins, right?)<br/><br/>This yields a couple of questions:<br/><ul style="margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0;"><li>Is this technologically possible? (Probably.)</li><li>Is this bad to force it upon users? (Probably.)</li><li>Should we implement such a feature? (I don't know, I wouldn't unless we don't have a choice, better half a defense than none!)</li></ul><br/>So, are there any alternatives to combat "coin lineage"?</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/d3c1dd906ee2aa67aabb059f412de50ae822efdcbfbf55a613f4c4e7b89b181e