Transaction

j"19HxigV4QyBv3tHpQVcUEQyq1pzZVdoAutM<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg10748#msg10748">Quote from: lfm on August 23, 2010, 05:28:14 AM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg10745#msg10745">Quote from: FreeMoney on August 23, 2010, 05:23:13 AM</a></div><div class="quote">I really don't even like the idea of one person having ability to send messages. Even if I/we trust that person now, we might not later, or it might be a different person, or they might get tortured/bribed/blackmailed. <br/></div><br/>It's open source! If you don't trust Satoshi or think he is going to be coerced, replace his key with your own so only you have the power to shutdown your nodes.<br/><br/></div><br/>Well, yeah, that's what I'd need to do, but since I'd have to buy/beg it from someone who can implement I'd prefer to have the main client just be what I want. Also I'd stay more comfortable with bitcoin on the whole if other people don't have a centrally controlled client. I know I could convince them to use a non-special-key version, but really that's what I'm doing right now.<br/><br/>Messages only is not a big deal, but I think it does start down a "special user" path that I'd prefer not to follow.</div> text/html