Transaction

d2fd063f9f054d784e145556e2a8a0fe3d7899bdf4764aa7b026caa7423d962d
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 15:35:09
Fee Paid
0.00000013 BSV
(
0.00536695 BSV
-
0.00536682 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.38 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
94,386
Size Stats
1,252 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00536682 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMè<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=661.msg7034#msg7034">Quote from: em3rgentOrdr on August 02, 2010, 04:39:19 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><br/>Thanks for addressing my concern! &nbsp;I think you are right...I wrongly assumed that people are stupid enough to blindly reconnect the two bitcoin networks (at which point the more powerful network would wipe out all the bitcoins created in the weaker network and transactions performed in the weaker network, if I understand bitcoin correctly). &nbsp;It seems the proper thing that the bitcoin community should do upon such a massive disconnect is to add some sortof marker to every block chain indicating which network it belongs to, so that upon reconnection, the two bitcoin currencies can coexist. &nbsp;I suppose each bitcoin community would properly fork the source code to do something along this line.<br/></div><br/>It would seem to me it still warrant a bitcoin exchange market.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/d2fd063f9f054d784e145556e2a8a0fe3d7899bdf4764aa7b026caa7423d962d