j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=501.msg5809#msg5809">Quote from: Olipro on July 26, 2010, 03:17:27 AM</a></div><div class="quote">OK, so given that the SHA256 is now 100% assembler code, I figured I might as well just build it entirely using Visual Studio, so I did just that and performance was exactly the same.<br/><br/>So, for those of you who have found the VS builds to be more stable, <a href="http://www.4shared.com/file/ifaR6kVP/Bitcoin_VS_x64_asm.html">click here to get it</a><br/></div>Yeah, runs every bit as fast as the Intel tweaked ones from what I could tell in testing, plus the program is half the size compiled. <img alt="Smiley" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/smiley.gif"/></div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/cf4d58f89ce5bb9fdef54eb8fac8a103b57d54e51c1c3f6fa11872e60a7dbf06