Transaction

cc8fadee9d7af0ef9944a4c175d3a88f009313be03ccc1928bf33cae3804cc41
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 18:46:22
Fee Paid
0.00000016 BSV
(
0.00284043 BSV
-
0.00284027 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.57 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
93,848
Size Stats
1,513 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00284027 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMì<div class="post">OK thanks riX.<br/><br/>So, once Bitcoin has connected to at least one node then the -connect option will eliminate the 6667 warnings.<br/><br/>Is Bitcoin using any kind of 'peer exchange' or DHT because this still does not seem to prevent the constant Tor 'exit' warnings and therefore Tor's requirement to try a new 'exit' node for connection. (which is problematic ! For Tor anyway, not Bitcoin <img alt="Wink" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/wink.gif"/> ) This is really what I meant by "However, Bitcoin must try to connect with all nodes to check its not missing any blocks ?" I just communicated it incorrectly.<br/><br/>I2P would seem to be a much easier solution to implement to increase a Bitcoins users anonymity.<br/><a href="http://forum.i2p2.de/viewtopic.php?t=3946&amp;sid=213e3cd998db98c4511675ecbba17af4">http://forum.i2p2.de/viewtopic.php?t=3946&amp;sid=213e3cd998db98c4511675ecbba17af4</a><br/><br/>I'm also testing JonDonym <a href="http://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/">http://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/</a> (only the paid services support socks !) However, they do accept paysafecards which can currently be brought in exchange for Bitcoins. <img alt="Grin" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/grin.gif"/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/cc8fadee9d7af0ef9944a4c175d3a88f009313be03ccc1928bf33cae3804cc41