Transaction

c9af269d0d0bb7f85a33a9eba36f853fd9a1ca6d3a1f3dc1e5fb2ec925bb0b7d
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 07:13:42
Fee Paid
0.00000012 BSV
(
0.01070143 BSV
-
0.01070131 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.61 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
97,362
Size Stats
1,131 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.01070131 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMn<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28917#msg28917">Quote from: satoshi on December 10, 2010, 05:29:28 PM</a></div><div class="quote">Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't scale.</div><br/>If you say "no" after you've seen how this runs on the test network, I will totally respect that and won't generate domain registrations on the live network.<br/><br/>Bitcoin is your bird, and if you don't want it to soar as high as it can, that's OK.<br/><br/>But even if the domain name stuff is on a separate chain, there is still going to be a Bitcoin transaction for every DNS registration. So having two chains would cause no reduction in the <i>number</i> of Bitcoin transactions, just 40 or 50 bytes reduction in the <i>size</i> of the transactions in the Bitcoin chain.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/c9af269d0d0bb7f85a33a9eba36f853fd9a1ca6d3a1f3dc1e5fb2ec925bb0b7d