Transaction

c19f70e13919b239fbb1b3f269d36fac2cedcee8a1ec8bc4e156e594bee264c4
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-30 15:03:31
Fee Paid
0.00000011 BSV
(
0.00144754 BSV
-
0.00144743 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.07 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
95,627
Size Stats
1,092 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00144743 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMH<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1332.msg14966#msg14966">Quote from: theymos on October 02, 2010, 06:11:11 AM</a></div><div class="quote">The larger extraNonce gets, the slower generating will get.<br/></div><br/>But that effect would be totally insignificant.&nbsp; Even the standard client is optimized so that it doesn't need to hash the entire block header if only the last part of it has changed.&nbsp; That last part includes the nonce but not the extraNonce, so a larger extraNonce wouldn't cost anything for the vast majority of all hashes, namely those where only the normal nonce has been incremented.&nbsp; With today's transaction volumes, the cost of hashing the extraNonce should be less than a millionth of a percent for pools with thousands of members.&nbsp; </div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/c19f70e13919b239fbb1b3f269d36fac2cedcee8a1ec8bc4e156e594bee264c4