Transaction

bfc26a52263ae54e474d8f6c59cdc80c2570a36f83d7082c021e31d5b5dbfe1a
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-24 08:15:57
Fee Paid
0.00000013 BSV
(
0.01639635 BSV
-
0.01639622 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.29 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
102,133
Size Stats
1,263 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.01639622 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMó<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=217.msg1857#msg1857">Quote from: dkaparis on June 29, 2010, 12:36:58 AM</a></div><div class="quote">FWIW I'd vote for 1.0 too.<br/><br/>As NLS and D҉ataWraith have pointed, there are certain perceptions associated with a 1.0 release and they are mostly reasonable. Trying to cheat these perceptions in such way is unwise in my opinion. Much better to release 1.0 now and do another minor release or two shortly afterwards.<br/><br/></div><br/>And if not 1.0, there's nothing wrong with 0.3. Tor is only at 0.2 and is a popular anonymity network. It's all about networking and how you present the application. Tor has user-friendly client software and a user-friendly website. Is Bitcoin really even 1.0 software? I would argue that it is still missing a lot of polish and features. 0.3 is fine; just improve the marketing, the user-friendliness and look &amp; feel of the website, and usage will keep increasing.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/bfc26a52263ae54e474d8f6c59cdc80c2570a36f83d7082c021e31d5b5dbfe1a