Transaction

bcb4fe6dbbca9bdf8b4e2ede1cdebdeebdbe5d4b1842ab55758394c7bb606e93
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-28 07:53:34
Fee Paid
0.00000010 BSV
(
0.00605450 BSV
-
0.00605440 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.96 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
92,866
Size Stats
912 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00605440 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM“<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=571.msg5754#msg5754">Quote from: satoshi on July 25, 2010, 08:48:01 PM</a></div><div class="quote">bitcoinaddress = RIPEMD-160(SHA-256(publickey))<br/><br/>Correct me if I'm wrong (please, and I'll gladly eat crow) but I think it would be hard to use an analytical attack on RIPEMD-160 in this case.<br/></div><br/>I think you are correct on the analytical attack. At least a far as I understand (minimally) the mathematical genius that is analyzing them.<br/><br/>I was worried it was the simpler:<br/><br/>bitcoinaddress = RIPEMD-160(publickey)<br/><br/><br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/bcb4fe6dbbca9bdf8b4e2ede1cdebdeebdbe5d4b1842ab55758394c7bb606e93