j"19HxigV4QyBv3tHpQVcUEQyq1pzZVdoAutMÃ¥<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> WARNING: NON-CYPHERPUNK QUESTION
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:cypherpunks-legacy%40lists.cpunks.org?Subject=Re%3A%20WARNING%3A%20%20NON-CYPHERPUNK%20QUESTION&In-Reply-To=%3C199307161907.AA19293%40xtropia%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<style type="text/css">
pre {
white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-2.1, curent FF, Opera, Safari */
}
</style>
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005131.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="005140.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>WARNING: NON-CYPHERPUNK QUESTION</H1>
<B>anonymous at extropia.wimsey.com</B>
<A HREF="mailto:cypherpunks-legacy%40lists.cpunks.org?Subject=Re%3A%20WARNING%3A%20%20NON-CYPHERPUNK%20QUESTION&In-Reply-To=%3C199307161907.AA19293%40xtropia%3E"
TITLE="WARNING: NON-CYPHERPUNK QUESTION">anonymous at extropia.wimsey.com
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Jul 16 12:28:19 PDT 1993</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005131.html">WARNING: NON-CYPHERPUNK QUESTION
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005140.html">The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#5191">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#5191">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#5191">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#5191">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>
Clark Reynard asked:
Are there any fast, quick, reliable methods of forestalling phone
disconnection due to failure to pay the bills, and the ugly
reconnection fee which ensues thereupon?
I can't offer a method of *eliminating* your phone bill, but I have
been practicing a method of drastically *reducing* the charge for
local phone service.
Simply ask Pac Bell (In California) for "Lifeline" service. The
monthly bill is $1.31, after "credits" for "inside wire repair" and
"Tel Equip" (for buying your own phone(s)). Clark, do you think you
could afford that?
This gets you a local (outgoing) call allowance of 60 calls per month
(about 2 a day). Unlike regular measured service, which measures (and
charges) by call *and length of call*, each of your 60 calls under
lifeline can be of unlimited length. Back when I had a 2400 baud
modem, I frequently had single calls of 2-4 *hours* while uploading &
downloading files from various local BB's. Calls beyond your 60-call
allowance are charged at $.08 per call.
Of course, there's a catch. Lifeline service is only offered to
"poor" people. You have to sign a statement every year certifying
that your combined family income doesn't exceed their guidlines. But
although they warn you that the Public Utilities Commission "may
investigate" your claim; they apparently never do! Unlike the PG&E
lifeline program, Pac Bell doesn't ask for *any* documentation of your
income like W-2 forms or copies of your tax returns.
I've been on lifeline service for *years*, I think almost since they
started offering it, back when the Bell system was broken up, and
local phone rates were raised sharply. During most of that time, I
earned around $50,000/year. Now I'm retired & my pension is about
$24,000, still well above the lifeline "guideline".
One caveat, I live in an area of San Jose where many of my neighbors
are working-class, a few on welfare, etc. This scam might not work
from an address in Hillsboro, Los Gatos, or Saratoga; but who knows,
the PUC may be so incompetent and/or lazy that it might.
Considering the moral factors, if you *don't* claim lifeline
eligibility, then you are *charged* a few cents a month to pay for the
people who *do*! You are also charged $1.75 for "access to a long
distance carrier", even if you don't call long distance. (but
lifeline customers get an offsetting credit and still have long
distance access). So you have to choose to be a sheep or a wolf, a
victim or a victimizer, to either take unfair advantage of the system
or have it take unfair advantage of you; there is no middle ground.
Consider the pragmatic factors. Based on my experience, the chances of
getting "caught" seem remote. If I'm ever investigated, I plan to
play dumb and claim I didn't understand the lifeline forms I signed.
Since I didn't provide any false documentation of a low income (they
didn't *ask* for any), be pretty hard to prove intent to commit fraud.
So I expect the worst that could happen is that I'd have to pay some
estimate of what my correct bill might have been less what I actually
paid. I suspect there's a statute of limitations, which I've already
exceeded for most of the time I've been on lifeline. So this sounds
like a good bet. If you win, you win big; if you lose, you break
even, with chances of losing being much less than 50/50.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005131.html">WARNING: NON-CYPHERPUNK QUESTION
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005140.html">The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#5191">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#5191">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#5191">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#5191">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks-legacy">More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
text/htmlbinary(0f431c93fa0861f2e1fb0a2f523acb6692ca751b
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/ba85c8e70ce7c7d5ad56e24ef2a21d4e6a97c71c86c8d940c25d3b3240f2ba12