Transaction

ba04deeffb9c66166426bdc0af1565af2a29dfa3edfefb8d40aa34cb27de61ac
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 09:20:47
Fee Paid
0.00000014 BSV
(
0.00927842 BSV
-
0.00927828 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.28 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
93,992
Size Stats
1,361 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00927828 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMU<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=501.msg4518#msg4518">Quote from: Olipro on July 20, 2010, 09:02:02 PM</a></div><div class="quote">So, after a lot of experimentation, pulling out of hair, cursing of the developer, I finally managed to get a build of Bitcoin compiled under MSVC.<br/><br/>all optimizations are on including SSE2, LTCG and favouring of Intel64 (well hey, that's my processor)<br/><br/>Performance difference? The two builds I made (namely 32 and 64 bit) are practically equal in terms of performance - however, their performance is not equal to the stock build currently available.<br/><br/>On my quad-core with the stock Windows binary available from bitcoin.org I get about 1700k hashes a second. With the builds I produced under MSVC I get 2500K a second. Anyone interested?<br/></div>I've got a spare server using a 8-core 64-bit Intel - 64 bit Windows 2003 server. I'd be curious if there is a difference from the stock, the machine currently does about 5000khash/s, I'd be curious if the 64bit native build would be better.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/ba04deeffb9c66166426bdc0af1565af2a29dfa3edfefb8d40aa34cb27de61ac