Transaction

b8bf967cd4bd904307e8d7dbe99468216ed0e1d1e6b2a25af76e6c929e47d155
2024-03-27 21:30:57
0.00000024 BSV
(
0.00691026 BSV
-
0.00691002 BSV
)
10.06 sat/KB
1
73,826
2,384 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00691002 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMS<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55.msg1038#msg1038">Quote from: Karmicads on May 01, 2010, 06:06:53 AM</a></div><div class="quote">A freenet URI is like this:<br/><br/><a href="http://127.0.0.1:8888/USK@oshw3DxmJUt7q4ThF4dCez5IXbc9hCGcv0VuwLRCmeQ,ckeXv20F1gBzkqssB4RXHZ2nB1YRT8Pb8KYZk8wj-bs,AQACAAE/occamsrazor/6/f.pdf">http://127.0.0.1:8888/USK@oshw3DxmJUt7q4ThF4dCez5IXbc9hCGcv0VuwLRCmeQ,ckeXv20F1gBzkqssB4RXHZ2nB1YRT8Pb8KYZk8wj-bs,AQACAAE/occamsrazor/6/f.pdf</a><br/></div><br/>There you go, we could easily do it the same way, like:<br/><a href="http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=">http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=</a>&lt;bitcoinaddress&gt;;amount=&lt;amount&gt;<br/><br/>Bitcoin can answer port 8330 on local loopback just as it does for JSON-RPC on 8332. &nbsp;It would give an HTTP answer.<br/><br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55.msg1045#msg1045">Quote from: DataWraith on May 02, 2010, 11:13:09 AM</a></div><div class="quote">A bitcoin-link should be more like mailto: than magnet: IMHO.<br/></div><br/>I think we can do that.<br/><br/>Although it would be possible for Bitcoin to take care of business in the HTTP response by presenting HTML UI to the user, as a user I would wonder if some website is trying to trick me or if I'm really talking to my own Bitcoin server.<br/><br/>The HTTP response could simply be HTML with the JavaScript equivalent of the back button, sending it back to the page. &nbsp;Bitcoin then pops up the Send Bitcoins dialog with the destination bitcoin address and amount already filled in. &nbsp;It would work just like a mailto: link that pops up a new email with the address filled in.<br/><br/>127.0.0.1 loopback is accessible by any user on the machine, it doesn't have per-user separation, but it's OK because it would only serve the convenience function of pre-filling the fields in a dialog. &nbsp;You'd still have to press Send. &nbsp;We'd have to make sure the Send button is not selected so it couldn't jump into the foreground while you're typing a space or enter.<br/><br/><br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/b8bf967cd4bd904307e8d7dbe99468216ed0e1d1e6b2a25af76e6c929e47d155