Transaction

b8aa01b3e31a1c2f48b6a28548d67f4e76972d73203ff89c83ce85b9ae414f7b
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-27 15:52:17
Fee Paid
0.00000024 BSV
(
0.00740578 BSV
-
0.00740554 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.22 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
91,303
Size Stats
2,347 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00740554 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM.<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=12.msg51#msg51">Quote from: madhatter2 on December 12, 2009, 06:34:21 AM</a></div><div class="quote">I almost have the svn 0.2 compiling on Mac OS X 10.4.11/Intel (I also have a PPC970 machine here as well so a PPC build would be possible as well). The windowing is native carbon too via wxwidgets! It is FAST! <img alt="Wink" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/wink.gif"/> I had to create a new makefile (makefile.osx; based on makefile.unix of course.. given any thought to using autoconf?) and put some ifdef's into header.h. I have patches. I will keep toying around. I might try it on FreeBSD next.<br/></div>Mac support would be nice.&nbsp; wxWidgets really pays off for cross platform.<br/><br/>Please don't try PPC.&nbsp; PPC is big-endian and Bitcoin is little-endian, there would be endless endian bugs making it harder for me to debug the network if there's a potentially byte-swapping node out there.&nbsp; PPC is on its way out anyway.<br/><br/>Considered autoconf.&nbsp; Autoconf is a necessity for large projects with a quagmire makefile, but I think we're small enough that it's more optimal without it.&nbsp; I'd rather keep the makefile simple as long as possible.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader">Quote</div><div class="quote">I think that breaking bitcoin into two apps is ideal. A wxwidgets front end (since it is mostly all there) and a backend that binds to a control TCP socket. I have been reading over the source to see how hard it would be to break it apart and I think it should be fairly simple. Of course an API would have to be developed.<br/></div>My head hurts just thinking about that.&nbsp; Funnelling all the UI backend through a TCP connection would make everything twice as hard.&nbsp; There's too much bandwidth between the UI and the internal data structures in order to keep the listview control updated, because of the way the listview control works.<br/><br/>I'd rather have command line control, that would get us remote admin and batch automation.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/b8aa01b3e31a1c2f48b6a28548d67f4e76972d73203ff89c83ce85b9ae414f7b