Transaction

b1faf7ae2e030f35ee8da9266ab8f6261f65a152d22e5c9989cf718c440b6e69
2024-03-28 09:13:21
0.00000017 BSV
(
0.00594151 BSV
-
0.00594134 BSV
)
10.61 sat/KB
1
74,147
1,601 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00594134 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMD<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7713#msg7713">Quote from: bytemaster on August 05, 2010, 06:12:02 PM</a></div><div class="quote">So I send a transaction of .001 BTC from me to Fred and .000001 BTC from me to A.&nbsp; &nbsp;I send a different one to B and C.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br/><br/>Now A, B, and C cannot make a profit by sending that transaction for anyone else to crunch on so if they want to collect they have to process it.<br/><br/>The trick is enforcing the rule that 0.001 only flows from me to fred once and not in each block.<br/></div>I'm thoroughly confused on what, exactly, you're proposing.<br/><br/>I want to make a 100 Bitcoin transaction to you.<br/><br/>You're proposing that I need to pay a "transmit fee" ... which is paid to who and does what, exactly?<br/><br/>If I pay it to A, B, and C, does that mean they rebroadcast the transaction to everybody they're connected to?&nbsp; Do they, in turn, pay transmit fees to the nodes they're rebroadcast it to?&nbsp; What stops them from saying "Thank you very much for the transmit fee" and cheating (drop my transaction on the floor)?<br/><br/>Satoshi's proposal that all transaction carry a minimum fee to cover network overhead makes sense; whoever generates the block with the transaction gets the fee.<br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/b1faf7ae2e030f35ee8da9266ab8f6261f65a152d22e5c9989cf718c440b6e69