j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg27645#msg27645">Quote from: em3rgentOrdr on December 07, 2010, 04:56:51 AM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg27629#msg27629">Quote from: kiba on December 07, 2010, 04:30:24 AM</a></div><div class="quote">At any rate, do we have enough information that's agreed so that the core hackers can develop right now?<br/></div><br/>Well before starting coding, let's make sure we have the protocol clearly written out. For instance, are we going to take my suggestion of using unitary, non-fractional, bitdnscoins where 1 block == 1 bitdnscoin, instead of having the number of bitdnscoins per block start at 50 and half every few years? Also, there is no need for fractional bitdnscoins since it doesn't make too much sense to own one-tenth of a domain name. And, keep in mind, people can use fiat money or even bitcoins when trading unitary bitdnscoins, incase they need to make a trade of two domain names with unequal subjective valuations.<br/></div><br/>+1 on that.</div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/afee4e0d8a979b386d3dd5cc43ec05ddaf8a4304bbb76b9983ba1a50ca2b712f