Transaction

a960e4bccddde9fce18d55c4d83a88fb272fe15bd3230da2ef1e2b6e1ff6d2e2
Timestamp (utc)
2019-09-04 02:17:58
Fee Paid
0.00001565 BSV
(
0.00001565 BSV
-
0.00000000 BSV
)
Fee Rate
1,055 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
337,213
Size Stats
1,483 B

1 Output

Total Output:
0.00000000 BSV
  • jmeta!1KJ8jEr9tvTJcTRYTb2TeiuzzEuJ9EDTB@5998a2ec45807414d518046bd8c61ecfa0a32dbdd8bf76a93294826cdb48e738|"1KYcQfsKZCF876ySQcAfD5G6k86BVvCjuu|"1PuQa7K62MiKCtssSLKy1kh56WWU7MtUR5SETcontentM`A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/a960e4bccddde9fce18d55c4d83a88fb272fe15bd3230da2ef1e2b6e1ff6d2e2