Transaction

a78d82af856489e5e1bdfe489e183f098cb917db5a8eaaff6a22a935d28f6f9a
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 12:35:25
Fee Paid
0.00000019 BSV
(
0.00700372 BSV
-
0.00700353 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.21 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
94,549
Size Stats
1,860 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00700353 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMH<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28949#msg28949">Quote from: jgarzik on December 10, 2010, 07:22:40 PM</a></div><div class="quote">It might be coins, but it doesn't have to be.&nbsp; Your reward could be a portion of namespace, ie. the domains themselves.<br/><br/>The possibilities are endless.<br/><br/>Bitcoin rewards you, essentially, with a piece of [digital] property.<br/></div><br/>If you are a miner and you "win" the block, yes, you can throw in any domains to the chain for free I suppose, and the network could accept or reject your block depending on whatever rules that network sets up to regulate that behavior.&nbsp; That is like a Bitcoin miner can throw any transactions they care for as much as they care without having to pay a transaction fee, since they are paying for themselves.&nbsp; Including a transaction fee in the process is just rearranging coins and doesn't change the net amount actually being spent or received.<br/><br/>I think that is of limited utility, unless you are saying that miners can eventually "earn" the "right" to a top-level domain after a certain number of hashes and inclusions into the domain registry.&nbsp; That would be an artificial form of scarcity that would be interesting to implement, but it still fails to get fees paid by registrants to the registrar.&nbsp; It would just make you "god-king" over a particular TLD... if you really "owned" that.<br/><br/>Such a non-coin "reward" also doesn't provide any incentive to maintain the database, while a coin-based reward would.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/a78d82af856489e5e1bdfe489e183f098cb917db5a8eaaff6a22a935d28f6f9a