Transaction

j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545.msg18213#msg18213">Quote from: davidonpda on October 23, 2010, 04:03:03 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545.msg18211#msg18211">Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on October 23, 2010, 03:45:45 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545.msg18208#msg18208">Quote from: grondilu on October 23, 2010, 03:28:34 PM</a></div><div class="quote">a paiement label is not necessary.<br/></div><br/>Sure it is "not necessary" but still would be useful for people.<br/><br/>Perhaps some people would like to keep one BTC address for some reasons.<br/>Also bigger financial institutions won't really like the idea of different account number for each transation.<br/><br/></div><br/>I don't think the keys should really be thought of as an account number per transaction. That logic I think is misleading. You can have millions of keys associated to one wallet / account. <br/></div><br/>What about the increase of the block size, then ?<br/><br/>Even if 512o per transaction is small, it might represent a significative amount since all has to be stored in the block chain.<br/><br/></div> text/html