Transaction

a5d65b0b9dd6e0484020635fa4e99e2cdecf890856fc4475a93a74e1e7bd0f32
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-24 17:25:00
Fee Paid
0.00000012 BSV
(
0.00980475 BSV
-
0.00980463 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.85 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
97,399
Size Stats
1,105 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00980463 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMU<div class="post">Can't we force a user to use a new address for receiving payments?<br/>Every time a payment is received display another Bitcoin address in the address bar. (only transactions via Bitcoin addresses, NOT IPs of course, since that'd be useless, right?)<br/>The actual key would still be kept to ensure that the user would still receive payments of people sending to the same address. (We wanna minimize "lost" Bitcoins, right?)<br/><br/>This yields a couple of questions:<br/><ul style="margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0;"><li>Is this technologically possible? (Probably.)</li><li>Is this bad to force it upon users? (Probably.)</li><li>Should we implement such a feature? (I don't know, I wouldn't unless we don't have a choice, better half a defense than none!)</li></ul><br/>So, are there any alternatives to combat "coin lineage"?</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/a5d65b0b9dd6e0484020635fa4e99e2cdecf890856fc4475a93a74e1e7bd0f32