Transaction

a5bc406ca4a9009e56f0c45a67b2ae0b2c3bbae8136ec1becb1d1a67b698693c
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-31 00:51:38
Fee Paid
0.00000017 BSV
(
0.00062473 BSV
-
0.00062456 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.08 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
95,986
Size Stats
1,685 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00062456 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM™<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28146#msg28146">Quote from: kiba on December 08, 2010, 04:02:27 PM</a></div><div class="quote">It could set some precedent for protocol change that allow people to shut down certain domains.<br/><br/>I suspect most of the domain names will be grabbed by speculators who will ransom it to large corporations. Search engines would ignore domain names that violate certain standard of a business mark.<br/></div><br/>Who would be given the "authority" to remove domain names?&nbsp; That implies central authority of some sort that has control over this network.<br/><br/>Domain squatting has a time honored and long tradition anyway and isn't going to change with how we are going to be running this system.&nbsp; By setting up a system to "delist" a domain name, it also sets up the person or group of people with presumably some private key which can in turn authorize the removal of domains as a target for receiving judicial injunctions and potentially other sorts of legal problems.&nbsp; If instead you can demonstrate that it is cryptographically impossible to change the domain registration information, all you can do is throw your hands up and say "I can't change that, sorry".<br/><br/>The owner of the IP address referenced by the domain registration should be the target of attack, not the domain registration system.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/a5bc406ca4a9009e56f0c45a67b2ae0b2c3bbae8136ec1becb1d1a67b698693c