Transaction

a3106bb4de90f3f2cb1c0bb3fb9fd7d14097d63d8faa215a2a1e1cc445c9e367
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 04:54:34
Fee Paid
0.00000015 BSV
(
0.01249709 BSV
-
0.01249694 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.52 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
93,923
Size Stats
1,425 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.01249694 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM”<div class="post">@dtvan: all 3 excellent points. <br/>1) IP records don't need to be in the chain, just do registrar function not DNS. &nbsp;And CA problem solved, neat.<br/>2) Pick one TLD, .web +1.<br/>3) Expiration and significant renewal costs, very important.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg29130#msg29130">Quote from: joe on December 11, 2010, 10:53:58 AM</a></div><div class="quote">However, thinking more about this now I support inclusion of additional coinbases / tracking systems in the main network. The reason for doing this is so as not to water down CPU power into multiple networks. We want one strong network, so the network should be versatile.<br/></div>Avoiding CPU power fragmentation is no longer a reason. &nbsp;Independent networks/chains can share CPU power without sharing much else. &nbsp;See: <a href="http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696">http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696</a> and <a href="http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715">http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715</a><br/></div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/a3106bb4de90f3f2cb1c0bb3fb9fd7d14097d63d8faa215a2a1e1cc445c9e367