Transaction

7fa2a0b7c021c772b8609079bb097d33bb32aac2c8a9bfc04e08eb2dbd8bae74
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 05:38:30
Fee Paid
0.00000014 BSV
(
0.01173588 BSV
-
0.01173574 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.61 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
94,243
Size Stats
1,319 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.01173574 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM*<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=661.msg7152#msg7152">Quote from: knightmb on August 03, 2010, 04:56:25 AM</a></div><div class="quote">I have a definitive answer for you all.<br/><br/>I built a test network on 5 computers, each running the client stock (fresh install) and had them all network to each other. They generated blocks all day (it's easy when the difficulty is 1.000), and after some transactions between them all (built up to 50 blocks doing this), I then connected them back to the "outside" world and as soon as they got in sync with the network, all the generated coin and transactions were wiped out and replaced by what is current on the network now.<br/><br/>So to answer your question, if the network is split and merges days/weeks/years later, whoever has the longest block chain (most CPU time) will win and the previous block chain will be wiped.<br/></div><br/>Cool. I guess you aren't seeing the transactions being redone because the accounts had no valid coins at all, right?</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/7fa2a0b7c021c772b8609079bb097d33bb32aac2c8a9bfc04e08eb2dbd8bae74