Transaction

j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26912#msg26912">Quote from: creighto on December 05, 2010, 01:01:58 AM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26842#msg26842">Quote from: witchspace on December 04, 2010, 07:32:52 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26838#msg26838">Quote from: brucewagner on December 04, 2010, 07:23:51 PM</a></div><div class="quote">Also, leaking military secrets can be considered treason and is a very serious crime in most countries. &nbsp; Free Speech always has legal limits.<br/></div>Yes -- the leaker can be considered a traitor.<br/><br/><br/></div><br/>One that note, I smell a rat.&nbsp; I've worked for the beast, and there is <b>no way whatever</b> that a private is going to have access 1) to top-secret communications 2) unmonitored 3) on a secure computer 4) with a cd-rom drive 5) that has access to secrets not in his own section.<br/><br/>There is no way this kid did this.<br/></div><br/>I'm glad that you have left the dark side, creighto.&nbsp; You make an interesting point that a private could not have gotten access to all this (but then again, some of these gubbamint bureacracies are extremely inefficient).&nbsp; Bradley Manning may simple just be a fall guy, scapegoat, or framed by the real leaker...who may never be caught.&nbsp; Anyway, it's all speculation.&nbsp; </div> text/html