Transaction

633972d950eecac7189f7534afbbcff4e335e982d97f02c8cf83ed9bb4a938ec
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 22:54:32
Fee Paid
0.00000016 BSV
(
0.00021507 BSV
-
0.00021491 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.58 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
97,369
Size Stats
1,512 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00021491 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMì<div class="post">I've managed to set up dependencies and build bitcoin with MS Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition. I'll give 2010 a try at some time.<br/><br/>There is a custom allocator class in serialize.h, secure_allocator, that fails to build with non-debug runtime selected. It is my understanding allocator classes require a template copy constructor, I've attached a small patch that solves the problem.<br/><br/>As Satoshi noted elsewhere, the MSVC build is indeed significantly slower khash/s-wise (more than twice) than the prebuilt one (MinGW?), even though I enabled the highest optimization level options and also global optimization with link-time code generation. I find that result strange, since MSVC is not known to have significantly worse optimizer than GCC's. Most probably the problem can be traced to the sha module that is extracted from Crypto++. I find in Crypto++ SVN there are revised versions of the module, including x86/x64 assembly for SHA-256. Using the newer versions would involve reintegrating their dependencies, though. On that note, why aren't we using OpenSSL's SHA-2 hashing functions instead? Since we already use OpenSSL, this would be a better solution than to manually support a SHA module from another library.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/633972d950eecac7189f7534afbbcff4e335e982d97f02c8cf83ed9bb4a938ec