j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMþ<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg27497#msg27497">Quote from: RHorning on December 06, 2010, 09:54:39 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg27491#msg27491">Quote from: em3rgentOrdr on December 06, 2010, 09:39:41 PM</a></div><div class="quote">That sounds nice. However, I was always uncomfortable with how block miners get 50 coins, and slowly halves. It confuses people and makes them uneasy. I would just say have a constant 1 block => 1 bitdnscoin.<br/></div><br/>I'm fine with that. It is an easy way to allocate the coins. The role of the halving of the coins "mined" every 2-4 years was mainly to strengthen the currency from an economic perspective, and something which many of those involved with the development of Bitcoin feel is necessary including Satoshi. I don't think it is nearly as critical in this situation, and as Bitcoin itself has proven there are people who will find value in the currency even if it doesn't half (as it hasn't yet).<br/></div><br/>Exactly. My points exactly. The reason for halving bitcoins over time does not really exist for bitdnscoins.</div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/5f6b73be2314aa75ebb9107e0eb720b2fa960a2dddff0f8ae45cda0fe0ddec99