Transaction

583ea3febfe74afe96cc0c4ecd2ce581c57e4682cf35e1d5beec4eabb6d734b0
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-23 09:11:28
Fee Paid
0.00000018 BSV
(
0.03185167 BSV
-
0.03185149 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.08 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
97,209
Size Stats
1,785 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.03185149 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMý<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg27691#msg27691">Quote from: chaord on December 07, 2010, 07:43:13 AM</a></div><div class="quote">I completely agree here.&nbsp; Even though his "blessing" is not necessary, it could potentially save a lot of time and effort if we can at least get Satoshi involved in the discussion.&nbsp; Does anyone here have enough of a working relationship with Satoshi? I know he is quite evasive these days.</div><br/>We need to get Satoshi's approval if something goes into the main Bitcoin client.&nbsp; There are other applications involved here besides the DNS system, even if that seems to have high priority at the moment.&nbsp; We could create a patch that would put hooks into the Bitcoin software to permit these kind of changes, but it could also be for naught if Satoshi rejects that patch.&nbsp; Since this is also a major architectural change to the software, it seems highly unlikely that it would get accepted unless we can demonstrate a clear need for this idea or show some huge benefits that would help Bitcoin be adopted as a currency.&nbsp; It is also a whole bunch of software development that depends on just one person accepting that change on essentially a whim.<br/><br/>In short, if we decide to put this into Bitcoin, Satoshi is the gatekeeper.&nbsp; We could completely fork Bitcoin, which is essentially what we are proposing here anyway as the alternative with these separate coins.&nbsp; That is our choice.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/583ea3febfe74afe96cc0c4ecd2ce581c57e4682cf35e1d5beec4eabb6d734b0