Transaction

558d0dfaaf176d5eea8d5ed5b9efeaebbe622b8d91f3cf623f9a47fa7059c4a3
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-24 00:04:12
Fee Paid
0.00000011 BSV
(
0.02158813 BSV
-
0.02158802 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.77 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
101,146
Size Stats
1,021 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.02158802 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=648.msg7111#msg7111">Quote from: nelisky on August 02, 2010, 11:52:27 PM</a></div><div class="quote">I've tried the git branch and results stay the same, almost half of what the vanilla svn can pump out. I'm running Intel and not AMD, but I am on 64bit:<br/><br/>Linux bah 2.6.32-22-server #33-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 28 14:34:48 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux<br/><br/>Anything I can try to help and debug this?<br/></div>Can you mail me a copy of cryptopp/obj/sha256.o to <a href="mailto:tcatm@gawab.com">tcatm@gawab.com</a>? I still fear Intels microcode in their CPUs wasn't made for such tight loops of SSE code. Have you run the test program? How many khash/s does it crunch?</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/558d0dfaaf176d5eea8d5ed5b9efeaebbe622b8d91f3cf623f9a47fa7059c4a3