j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMN<div class="post">yeah, that's why i didn't use it<br/><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1334.msg18218#msg18218">Quote from: m0mchil on October 23, 2010, 04:43:32 PM</a></div><div class="quote">... I removed usage of vectors. So the '-w 128' is not relevant anymore. Of course you can grab the vectors version from git and use it like before. It is really difficult to optimize for all possible devices. Current version is kind of best for all.<br/></div><br/>and i havent been compiling any miners myself (tried a few times but had no luck so far installing all required components on x64), so grabbing code x from y to patch z wouldn't help me much.<br/>i'm just a user anyway, not a coder (php-scripter for fun, but that's it), <br/>one could say <i>i represent the masses</i> (at least those that are interested in how it works), that's why i'm so happy that there's a few nice people to realease binaries.<br/><br/>playing around with frames just gives me a ~1-2% increase, not really worth mentioning and for the cost of a very low responding desktop.<br/><br/><br/>@m0mchil: you should really put your btc-address either into the initial post of this thread, or your sig, kinda hard to find already and will get even worse over time. <img alt="Wink" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/wink.gif"/></div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/54fd3e834d4e4df0eeae3d6a17e2aaa3a82c939ffc6d8a67425abf7cf71b66df