j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMT<div class="post">I think I initially misunderstood the blocks in that the hashes that we compute are independent of the address. Now, I believe that we are looking for something like sha256 (bitcoint address + amount (I am not sure whether the value is implicit, so this value might not be there) + <answer>) with some desired properties (of which the number of final zeros is an approximation), where + means some concatenation operator of bits.<br/><br/>If the computation is like that, _then_ it might work, but I don't see why someone cannot just only send you the worthless hashes (for you) and don't send those that are useful to you. By this mechanism they can bankrupt you. Anyway, I think it is a bad way to communicate with natural language only about these topics. Just write out the computations that you intend to do on the server and the client and then we can see whether it is a brilliant idea or a flawed one. Annotations on the computations as to which goal they intend to achieve is also useful for communication. <br/><br/>Forcing cooperation out of nodes is not easy. </div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/54aa05d753662f1cf2b2d1db680b2583f031899b16afee85fb85c6db4eae00dd