j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMí<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652.msg7033#msg7033">Quote from: kiba on August 02, 2010, 04:32:55 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652.msg7031#msg7031">Quote from: throughput on August 02, 2010, 04:27:40 PM</a></div><div class="quote">Well, wikipedia is not a public driven project. It is driven by a limited community of it's editors,<br/>that is for a long time. Wikipedia represent collective and often inconsistent point of view<br/>of a small (compared to society) group of people.<br/>"Playing by the rules" is a favorite game of them. Don't play that game, do not entertain them.<br/><br/>I believe, it is some form of sexual perversion, wikipedism or like that... <img alt="Lips sealed" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/lipsrsealed.gif"/><br/><br/>Just find another wikipedia editor and he will play instead of you.<br/></div><br/>There is Wikipedia and its hierarchy, just like government and their hierarchy. The idea that the government could represent the people is laughable. <br/><br/>Similarly, the Wikipedia hierarchy devolved into politicking, no sexual perversion needed.<br/></div><br/>Agree.<br/>I just count politicking itself as some form of sexual perversion, or like that... <img alt="Wink" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/wink.gif"/><br/><br/>Anyway, contacting wikipedia editor, who is external to this situation, will help a lot.<br/></div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/4fcb79103d8aa4bc0caea2c9e7b5fa7175ef141ffdf20ef86b7c9763d98d9a4e