Transaction

j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMH<div class="post">This is all very fascinating stuff.&nbsp; I read themos+nanotube's proposal, ribuck's proposal, and rhorning's.&nbsp; While I think I grasp the fundamental differences between them, I am not confident to weigh in.&nbsp; Could I ask that someone more knowledgeable than I am on these matters create a table (wiki?) that lists the proposals as they currently are?<br/><br/>I'm personally very intrigued by the idea of piggy backing on the existing bitcoin network, if it can be done cleanly and with minimal modification to bitcoin (as per nanotube/themos suggested).<br/><br/>As Kiba pointed out, I am most excited for bitcoin to have it's intrinsic "use-value!"&nbsp; And it couldn't come at a more needed time what with wikileaks, pirate bay, etc all over the news.<br/><br/>Lastly, and this could be due to my lack of intimate knowledge of DNS, but will this work seamlessly with more secure DNS protocols as well? Also, is this designed to ultimately replace existing registrars or will this always be a "DomainShadow" system that is only used in the event of crisis (like wikileaks attack, etc)?<br/><br/>Overall, great work guys!!! If we can get some pros/cons of each proposal down on paper, I'm prepared to up my bounty considerably and help out where I can (perhaps on forming an official DomainChain/BitDNS foundation?)</div> text/html