Transaction

41129e079ab92b6a9ff5d1a56a4b53b4c2fa962fe2e8ac2da2aab3f38e07f0e6
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-29 02:31:36
Fee Paid
0.00000007 BSV
(
0.00451224 BSV
-
0.00451217 BSV
)
Fee Rate
11.02 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
96,325
Size Stats
635 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00451217 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM~<div class="post">So it's possible to switch "on the fly" to a new hash function? Wouldn't all the old transactions then be compromised (because they could be trivially recomputed)?<br/><br/>SHA-256 has already been weakened by a factor of 16 (according to my friend. I can't find documentation on that, but I trust him). That's 16 out of 2^256, so not a huge deal, but still.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/41129e079ab92b6a9ff5d1a56a4b53b4c2fa962fe2e8ac2da2aab3f38e07f0e6