Transaction

3e2fd46b44a2b6ff37dd7afd6ec5dca596c2d8bd9bae967136e0d16307b2c23a
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 08:19:44
Fee Paid
0.00000017 BSV
(
0.00991742 BSV
-
0.00991725 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.08 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
94,240
Size Stats
1,686 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00991725 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM™<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28146#msg28146">Quote from: kiba on December 08, 2010, 04:02:27 PM</a></div><div class="quote">It could set some precedent for protocol change that allow people to shut down certain domains.<br/><br/>I suspect most of the domain names will be grabbed by speculators who will ransom it to large corporations. Search engines would ignore domain names that violate certain standard of a business mark.<br/></div><br/>Who would be given the "authority" to remove domain names?&nbsp; That implies central authority of some sort that has control over this network.<br/><br/>Domain squatting has a time honored and long tradition anyway and isn't going to change with how we are going to be running this system.&nbsp; By setting up a system to "delist" a domain name, it also sets up the person or group of people with presumably some private key which can in turn authorize the removal of domains as a target for receiving judicial injunctions and potentially other sorts of legal problems.&nbsp; If instead you can demonstrate that it is cryptographically impossible to change the domain registration information, all you can do is throw your hands up and say "I can't change that, sorry".<br/><br/>The owner of the IP address referenced by the domain registration should be the target of attack, not the domain registration system.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/3e2fd46b44a2b6ff37dd7afd6ec5dca596c2d8bd9bae967136e0d16307b2c23a