j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMý<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg21292#msg21292">Quote from: sturle on November 10, 2010, 02:12:42 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg21283#msg21283">Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on November 10, 2010, 01:28:00 PM</a></div><div class="quote">Yeah this may be good for wikileaks, but not nocessarily good for Bitcoin. If bitcoin becomes publicly associated with wikileaks before going semi-mainstream, then it will be viewed by the "ruling class" (read: US government) as a tool for doing money laundering and another "gray" buisnesses. <br/></div>By your logic the USA should forbid money. At least on paper and metal, a lot of currencies, and money transfers to uncontrollable countries like Bermuda and Switzerland. Perhaps go completely communist. On a worldwide basis porn and gambling is a lot more controversial than Wikileaks. Only China and Thailand censor Wikileaks. A lot more countries censor porn and gambling sites. I don't think this will make the US government blink.<br/></div><br/>I hope you're right.<br/><br/><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg21293#msg21293">Quote from: Anonymous on November 10, 2010, 02:18:22 PM</a></div><div class="quote">Contrary to popular opinion it is not illegal to create your own currency. If they try to claim there is something illegal in the mere act of transferring value or bits of data they will look ridiculous. <br/></div><br/>Well, they already claim that something like "exchanging information about whereabouts of data" (BitTorrent sites) is illegal, so why not this ? I see no large difference.</div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/36ad331d358d459eb6beb0cddc00a86f7730a68e77ecc27209e8ba39f1a7a2eb