Transaction

341f3298fc20b850fdfc2edef45cc218f01ac7f667688df7f349a2f0ae808ce3
Timestamp (utc)
2024-03-22 09:29:13
Fee Paid
0.00000013 BSV
(
0.00914719 BSV
-
0.00914706 BSV
)
Fee Rate
10.37 sat/KB
Version
1
Confirmations
93,874
Size Stats
1,253 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
0.00914706 BSV
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMè<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=661.msg7034#msg7034">Quote from: em3rgentOrdr on August 02, 2010, 04:39:19 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><br/>Thanks for addressing my concern! &nbsp;I think you are right...I wrongly assumed that people are stupid enough to blindly reconnect the two bitcoin networks (at which point the more powerful network would wipe out all the bitcoins created in the weaker network and transactions performed in the weaker network, if I understand bitcoin correctly). &nbsp;It seems the proper thing that the bitcoin community should do upon such a massive disconnect is to add some sortof marker to every block chain indicating which network it belongs to, so that upon reconnection, the two bitcoin currencies can coexist. &nbsp;I suppose each bitcoin community would properly fork the source code to do something along this line.<br/></div><br/>It would seem to me it still warrant a bitcoin exchange market.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/341f3298fc20b850fdfc2edef45cc218f01ac7f667688df7f349a2f0ae808ce3