Transaction

j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMÝ<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg10745#msg10745">Quote from: FreeMoney on August 23, 2010, 05:23:13 AM</a></div><div class="quote">No! If you do that they'll torture you until you give them the key Satoshi!<br/><br/>But seriously, if the key has turn off power I'm not running that client. <br/><br/>I really don't even like the idea of one person having ability to send messages. Even if I/we trust that person now, we might not later, or it might be a different person, or they might get tortured/bribed/blackmailed. <br/><br/>I imagine this thinking comes from seeing all the people who haven't switched to 3.10 yet? <br/><br/>Having enough different implementations that none is a majority would mean a bug like the overflow would only lead to problems with the improperly coded client and not with the whole chain. Unless people writing new clients mostly copied your code, then any problems would remain. But if they were written from scratch to do what they should then any problems would not overlap.<br/><br/>Do I remember you saying you thought it would be a nightmare to have multiple implementations? I can't remember why you said that though.<br/></div><br/>+1</div> text/html