j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckMó<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg11162#msg11162">Quote from: BioMike on August 25, 2010, 06:23:45 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg11155#msg11155">Quote from: satoshi on August 25, 2010, 04:56:15 PM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg10742#msg10742">Quote from: BioMike on August 23, 2010, 05:15:43 AM</a></div><div class="quote">So, theoretical this is a first control system where <some goverment> can arrest satoshi and demand <br/>that he hands over his key (or get it from his computer) and shut down the complete network?<br/><br/>Or is that not possible? How far would <some goverment> get?<br/></div>This is what makes me think the people objecting don't know what they're talking about. It can't "shut down the complete network". <br/></div>I've never objected this change/idea, just asking if this was possible and to what extent.<br/>What's wrong with getting informed? <img alt="Wink" border="0" src="/static/img/emoticons/wink.gif"/><br/></div>My apologies, your post was indeed a question not a statement.<br/></div> text/html
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/28f6cf8556fd4db0c9ce4b953d09ee35e95de742efae8df09dd8fd6cdfe9d39d